Read 18 of 24

Three logos, different ledgers

Published 2 October 2026

The logo looks constant. The profit line does not.

IndianOil's original FY2025 directors' report records standalone profit after tax of Rs 12,962 crore, against Rs 39,619 crore in FY2024. Its FY2026 annual report then records Rs 36,802 crore. The sequence is a fall of about sixty-seven percent followed by a rise of about 184%, calculated from the disclosed figures. Calling the company a permanently profitable toll booth misses the volatility already visible in its own filings. FY2025 directors' report; FY2026 annual report, operating-performance table.

The FY2026 report explains revenue growth partly through increased volume and receipt of government LPG compensation. Its profit explanation identifies improved refining and marketing margins linked to lower crude costs than the previous year. Those are the company's disclosed explanations. They describe input costs, margins and compensation, not management's ability to choose a stock-market profit at will.

The same report records borrowings falling from Rs 134,466 crore to Rs 110,668 crore, linking the reduction to profitability, internal cash generation and working-capital management. That is the financial bridge behind the earlier deregulation story: earnings and cash can reduce debt, which affects financing costs and resilience in the next cycle. Source record.

HPCL's FY2025 release tells a different version of the cycle. Standalone profit was Rs 7,365 crore against Rs 14,694 crore the prior year. Consolidated profit was Rs 6,736 crore against Rs 16,015 crore. Standalone and consolidated figures cannot be swapped to make a comparison look better or worse. They represent different accounting perimeters. HPCL FY2025 release.

Its physical performance had improved: record refinery throughput of 25.27 million tonnes and sales of 49.82 million tonnes. More throughput did not prevent annual profit from falling. Product cracks, marketing margins and other financial conditions matter alongside volume. The visible infrastructure can operate harder while the earnings environment becomes less generous. Source record.

BPCL's FY2025 integrated-report page gives refinery throughput of 40.51 million tonnes and a gross refining margin of $6.82 per barrel. These figures are informative but not an invitation to rank its net profitability against HPCL's $5.74 margin without reading the accounting definitions and sales mix. BPCL FY2025 report site.

Ownership is another source of confusion. In January 2018, the Indian government agreed to sell its 51.11% stake in HPCL to ONGC for Rs 36,915 crore. The official release describes a vertically integrated energy major capable of competing with international and domestic firms. This was a transfer to another state-controlled company, not a chairman buying HPCL personally. Finance ministry transaction release.

That arrangement places upstream production and downstream refining-marketing within a wider corporate relationship. It can provide a natural partial offset to a crude-price change, but does not eliminate segment risk, debt, investment requirements or public policy exposure. Integration is a structure, not immunity.

When the user asks who the real operators are, the factual answer is larger than the chairmen. Managers choose procurement, projects and execution. Boards approve major decisions. The state acts as controlling shareholder and policy authority. Banks finance working capital. Commodity markets price inputs. Consumers and export buyers determine sales. No single participant writes the whole outcome.

The essential stock-market questions follow from this structure: which margin is improving, which cash flow is delayed, what compensation is recognised, what capital expenditure is coming, and how much of the expected benefit is already in the share price? A photograph of three executives answers none of them.

The private company's split screen

Reliance's FY2026 oil-to-chemicals report gives revenue of Rs 662,401 crore and EBITDA of Rs 60,546 crore, compared with Rs 626,921 crore and Rs 54,988 crore in FY2025. It attributes the higher EBITDA to stronger transport-fuel cracks, efficient feedstock sourcing and higher domestic placement, while saying weak downstream chemical margins and late-year Middle East disruption constrained earnings. That is a disclosed example of several fuel mechanisms converging in one segment. Reliance FY2026 O2C account.

EBITDA is earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation. It is not the net profit available to shareholders and not the cash left after every project commitment. A large EBITDA number proves scale and operating earnings under the definition, not a frictionless cash machine.

The report lists 26.8 million tonnes of gasoil output, 14.9 million tonnes of gasoline and alkylate, and 5.2 million tonnes of aviation turbine fuel for FY2026. Product mix connects the company to several demand systems at once: trucks, cars and aircraft. Chemical products create another set of exposures. A diesel shortage can be helpful to one part of the operation while poor chemical spreads weigh on another. Source record.

Nayara gives a different ownership connection. Rosneft's company page records a 49.13% stake in Nayara and a twenty-million-tonne annual refining capacity at Vadinar. Nayara's own refinery page describes twenty million tonnes of capacity and the ability to handle grades from light and sweet to ultra-heavy and sour. Both sources establish the broad commercial link and capacity. They give differing complexity-index figures, so this edition does not use either as a definitive current comparison. Rosneft ownership disclosure; Nayara refinery description.

The Rosneft relationship gives a geopolitical context, but it does not prove the origin of every cargo processed at Vadinar. Ownership, sourcing and destination are separate facts. Treating a shareholder's nationality as evidence of every barrel's origin is a shortcut the trade record does not support.

The September retail restrictions therefore sit inside businesses with different integrated positions. The consumer sees a branded outlet; the company sees a portfolio of procurement, conversion, wholesale, retail and investment. The total group outcome cannot be read off the outlet queue.

The next annual result changes the picture again

HPCL's May 2026 official release extends the earlier profit sequence. Standalone FY2026 PAT was Rs 17,175 crore, versus Rs 7,365 crore in FY2025; consolidated PAT was Rs 18,047 crore, versus Rs 6,736 crore. Refinery throughput reached 26.04 million tonnes and sales 51.45 million. Reported gross refining margin was $8.79 a barrel, and standalone debt-equity fell from 1.38 to 0.80. The FY2025 comparison remains useful as history, but is not the latest result. HPCL FY2026 release.

That three-year sequence is the useful picture: very strong FY2024, a weaker FY2025, then a large FY2026 recovery. The existence of a state shareholder does not flatten the cycle. Product prices, operating performance, policy and compensation interact with the installed assets.

Capital expenditure was Rs 15,705 crore in FY2026, the release says. Money spent on new capacity is not an immediately available shareholder distribution. The company also describes ongoing commissioning work at the Rajasthan refinery and a fire in April 2026 that was controlled without loss of life or injury. Those are the company's dated disclosures, not a fresh verification of the project's current operating status. The episode shows why a project must be followed through commissioning rather than assumed complete from an investment announcement. Source record.

A rigorous comparison needs the correct issuer, period, accounting perimeter and metric for every row. A complete current investment comparison would also need later quarterly results, capital commitments and valuation. Historical annual figures cannot substitute for those checks.

BPCL completes the current annual comparison

BPCL's original 19 May 2026 results release supplies the correctly identified FY2026 record: standalone PAT of Rs 23,303 crore, up from Rs 13,275 crore; consolidated PAT of Rs 25,843 crore, up from Rs 13,337 crore. Throughput was 41.15 million tonnes and total sales 55.72 million tonnes. Its standalone debt-equity ratio declined from 0.29 to 0.11. The press release is a company source and the values are for the year ended 31 March 2026, not the later September operating environment. BPCL FY2026 release.

The sum is our arithmetic on the three standalone disclosures. It is not a national oil-sector profit total or a consolidated account; these firms have other corporate relationships and different business mixes. Sources: IOC, BPCL, HPCL.

The comparison establishes a strong completed-year recovery across all three, while the September retail-loss reporting establishes a later pressure point. There is no contradiction in reporting both. Annual profit includes a long period with conditions different from those prevailing in a particular September week. Treating the annual recovery as proof that every later litre is profitable would be as wrong as treating a September loss estimate as proof the prior annual profit did not exist.

That is the investing discipline the operators story actually needs: a chronology of margins and policy, not one permanent adjective attached to a company. The accounts tell you what occurred. Current operational evidence tells you what may be changing. Valuation determines what expectations you are paying for.

Put an upstream producer beside the three marketers

ONGC's audited FY2026 filing gives standalone net profit of Rs 32,894.02 crore against Rs 35,610.32 crore in FY2025. Consolidated profit was Rs 49,793.10 crore against Rs 38,328.61 crore. The standalone result fell while the consolidated result rose. Both are correct within their accounting perimeters; neither should be silently substituted for the other. ONGC audited FY2026 exchange filing.

That divergence is the point of adding ONGC to this story. A corporate group can contain upstream production, overseas operations, refining and retailing through different entities. Calling the whole group a simple bet on rising crude leaves those connections invisible. ONGC's May 2026 management release includes HPCL, MRPL and other businesses in its group discussion. The consolidated ledger joins exposures that the standalone upstream ledger does not. ONGC's results release.

For the same reason, adding ONGC consolidated profit to HPCL standalone profit can count a subsidiary's earnings twice. A sector total requires an explicit perimeter and elimination of overlaps. The earlier sum of the three OMC standalone figures is labelled as exactly that sum, not the profits of every Indian energy company or a consolidated national oil sector.

A producer's reserves also do not guarantee next year's cash. Wells require development, maintenance and replacement of declining output. Prices influence realised revenue, while gas-pricing rules and tax terms introduce other links. A refinery's engineering investment creates a different set of risks and opportunities. The PSU label tells you about ownership; the asset and contract tell you about the earnings mechanism.

And oil is only part of the energy bill. A different cargo, chilled rather than merely refined, connects the Gulf to India's fertiliser and industry.

Get the next file

One email when a new file is published. No paid service needed.

Email Subscribe

You are subscribed.